Pages

Thursday, 3 October 2013

New Building Canada Plan

The Golden Star reported in the October 2, 2013 edition that the Town is preparing for the next round of (New Building Canada Plan) grants and that long-term borrowing was suggested by staff as the best option.

I am totally opposed to the Town borrowing for this purpose.

Below is a brief that I made to council during the recent strategic planning session, which explains amongst other things, why increasing debt load for this purpose is not sustainable. This brief was prepared by myself and George Ross, (CA-retired). Mr Ross was the Chief Financial Officer for a major corporation prior to retirement.



Fiscal responsibility

What does it mean to be fiscally responsible?  Does council have appropriate fiscal policies in place? Does council have a clear set of financial goals and priorities that are fiscally responsible? Does the present 5-year plan reflect fiscally responsible policies? As with many concepts, fiscal responsibility means different things to different people. It must also be recognised that because of its nature as a service provider with revenue based on property taxes, responsible fiscal policies for municipal governments are different from the policies of senior levels of government. If council were to agree on a definition of fiscal responsibility, then councillors could measure all its policy decisions against that definition.

Fiscal Responsibility:  for municipalities means developing financial policies that are consistent with the long term provision of the services required and expected to sustain the community and its assets.

In an attempt to put financial constraints on municipalities and to enforce a level of fiscal responsibility, the Community Charter stipulates that a municipality must adopt a financial plan in which “The total of the proposed expenditures and transfer to other funds for a year must not exceed the total of the proposed funding sources and transfers from other funds for the year”.  A balanced budget!

Municipalities must conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the PSAB prescriptions. Under GAAP the statement of operations must include as an expense an allowance for depletion, depreciation and amortization (DD&A). This should apply to both reporting in the financial statements and budgeting in the 5-year plan. 

In 2012 the town reported a deficit of $500,517. In 2013 the budget shows an operating surplus of $1.3 million; however this was calculated without allowance for DD&A. When the financial statements are prepared at the end of the year an allowance for DD&A must be included. After applying an estimated DD&A of $2.4, a deficit of $1.1 million will be reported. 

The most powerful number generated by PSAB 3150 practices is the 2012 depreciation of all Tangible Capital Assets (TCA) owned by the town: $2,399,631. This financial term represents the collective asset value lost in a single year of in-service life. For the purposes of Council’s strategic planning, this is the ‘minimum’ annual investment target that should be met to ensure future delivery of services dependent upon these TCA.

If fiscal responsibility for municipalities means developing financial policies that are consistent with the long term provision of the services required and expected to sustain the community and its assets, then in future when constructing the 5-year financial  plan, DD&A should be included as an expense and that budget should not have a deficit. Balancing the budget must be achieved by adjusting either revenues or expenses or both. This will provide the cash flow to ensure future delivery of the services dependent upon these TCA.

Asset Management Plan
Depreciation is only an estimate of the capital investment required to maintain the assets and is rarely sufficient because of inflation. The working life of the asset is only an estimate and/or the asset may not need to be replaced. Senior government grants can also contribute to the capital required for renewal through grants. For these reasons it is important to have a sound and up-to- date asset management plan. 

Reserve Funds
The timing of expenditures on replacements and asset renewal will not match the timing of the charges for depreciation. Hence the need for reserve funds! 

Balancing the budget cannot be achieved by borrowing.
Philosophically; while it is true that capital expenditures on an individual asset should extend its life for the enjoyment of future generations of tax payers, it is also true that today’s taxpayers are enjoying assets that are depreciating and will have to be paid for by next generation taxpayers. 
DD&A (Depletion, Depreciation and Amortization) represents the collective asset value lost in a single year and as a matter of equity the taxpayers should pay for that use in the year it was enjoyed.

Practically; using debt to fund DD&A is unsustainable. Assuming that the town has a borrowing capacity of $10 million and that the DD&A is $2.5 million annually; then after 4 years the town would have reached its debt limit and would no longer have the option to borrow. The assets on the other hand continue to depreciate.

To achieve financial stability, the town must adjust revenues and expenses to create a balanced budget after an allowance for DD&A. In an ideal plan, cash flow from DD&A plus grants would take care of all the town’s capital expenditures.

New Building Canada Fund
The town should be in a position to take advantage of the New Building Canada Fund (NBCF) without resorting to borrowing and has already identified capital projects that were discussed during last year’s budget deliberations. Staff should determine which projects qualify for the NBCF. 

I can identify 3 sources of town funds for matching the NBCF.
·         Capital already allocated in the 2014 budget; $1,809,184
·         Water and sewer reserve funds; $600,000
·         Budgeted expenditure savings; $400,000

Every $1 saved is worth $3 in NBCF projects.

Keith W Hern
2013-08-26

The opinions expressed in this blog are my personal opinions and may not represent the opinions of other councillors nor the opinions of council.